May 12, 2020
Flawed Enviro Assessment Of Offshore Drilling Puts Marine Ecosystems At Risk
News Source: Sierra Club Canada Foundation
Environmental groups are taking legal action against the federal government for failing to properly assess the impacts of exploratory drilling for oil and gas in Newfoundland and Labrador’s offshore waters. It is the first Regional Assessment (RA) to be conducted under the new Impact Assessment Act.
The application, filed by Ecojustice lawyers on behalf of Ecology Action Centre, Sierra Club Canada Foundation and WWF-Canada, alleges that the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada relied on a deficient assessment report to accelerate exploratory drilling in the region. The organizations aim to prevent the government from exempting similar activity from future impact assessments and setting a dangerous precedent for future RAs in the country.
In February 2018, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador announced a plan to increase oil production and allow more than 100 new exploratory wells to be drilled in the offshore by 2030. Some of these wells are proposed in areas set aside to protect marine biodiversity. A Regional Assessment — which aims to assess the cumulative effects (combined effects of all past, present and potential future activities in the same area) — was conducted on exploratory drilling in the area. Despite significant data deficiencies, the federal government decided to create regulations that will exempt future exploratory drilling in the region from project-specific environmental impact assessments.
An increase in offshore oil and gas exploration poses a direct threat to marine ecosystems and could shatter Canada’s commitment to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Nevertheless, the RA Committee declined to analyze the risk to the local ecology and the cumulative effects of offshore drilling and recommended that the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board complete it. The government has also refused to hit pause on exploratory drilling projects in an area of ocean larger than the province of Alberta, before ensuring deficiencies in the report are resolved.
The government has signalled that it plans to use the flawed RA process to exempt future exploratory drilling projects from the more fulsome federal impact assessment process required by the Impact Assessment Act without understanding the risks of doing so. This could put all of Canada at risk of using this flawed example in future RAs.
James Gunvaldsen-Klaassen, Ecojustice lawyer said:
“The new Impact Assessment Act was introduced to protect the environment, improve the assessment process, and make decisions more transparent. One of the federal government’s first actions under the Act was to exempt from assessment a significant increase in oil exploration in Newfoundland and Labrador’s ecologically important offshore waters in a time of climate emergency. Exempting exploratory drilling from environmental review flies in the face of environmental stewardship and responsible decision-making.
“We’re taking legal action because Canadians across the country should be able to trust that their government is capable of following their own regulations to ensure that projects, including exploratory offshore oil drilling, will only proceed if they pass a proper assessment and their effects on the environment are properly accounted for.”
Jordy Thomson, Ecology Action Centre Marine Science and Conservation Coordinator said:
“In a time of climate and biodiversity crises, it’s unacceptable for our federal government to be creating regulations based on a rushed and deeply flawed assessment in order to fast-track harmful extractive projects. As the first of its kind, this regional assessment sets an extremely dangerous precedent for the country and risks lasting damage to marine biodiversity in our productive Atlantic waters by, for example, allowing drilling in sensitive and protected areas. We’re taking legal steps to ensure the government takes the time necessary and re-focuses on providing strong environmental protection.”
Gretchen Fitzgerald, Sierra Club Canada Foundation National Programs Director said:
“This regulation and rush to drill takes us completely in the opposite direction from the government’s stated commitments on climate change. Given the recent history of spills and accidents off Newfoundland, the risk of spills and even a blowout is simply too high to roll the dice for the over a hundred new wells on the books right now. Seismic blasting and noise from drilling threatens rich habitat for whales and other ocean life. The stakes were simply too high to let this regulation and the incomplete assessment upon which it relies to stand.
Sigrid Kuehnemund, VP Ocean conservation WWF-Canada said:
“It’s absolutely concerning that the RA committee recommends proceeding with exploration in areas set aside for protecting marine biodiversity and those that are deficient in data — areas that WWF-Canada has long advocated be off limits to oil and gas activity. A history of frequent spills in offshore areas shows the necessity of protecting sensitive habitats and the species that live there. This decision sets a dangerous precedent for both Newfoundland and Labrador as well as the rest of Canada. Sensitive and data-deficient areas need site-specific impact assessments, and protected areas must remain off limits to industrial development.”