Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Download Report

September 12, 2019

Access to Marine Genetic Resources (MGR): Raising Awareness of Best-Practice Through a New Agreement for Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ)

Publisher: Frontiers in Marine Science

Funders: German Research Foundation (DFG), Gulf of Mexico Research Consortium (CIGoM), Marie Curie H2020 fund, National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) National Capability, Natural History Museum, Nereus Fellow Program, OpenAccess Publication Fund of Freie Universit├Ąt Berlin, Swedish Research Council FORMAS, UK Seabed Resources

Authors: Adrian G. Glover, Angelika Brandt, Gabi Droege, Harriet Harden-Davies, Jane Eva Collins, Liliana Pardo-Lopez, Muriel Rabone, Sabine Zajderman, Tammy Horton, Thomas G. Dahlgren, Ward Appeltans

Language: English

Better scientific knowledge of the poorly-known deep sea and areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) is key to its conservation, an urgent need in light of increasing environmental pressures. Access to marine genetic resources (MGR) for the biodiversity research community is essential to allow these environments to be better characterised. Negotiations have commenced under the auspices of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to develop a new treaty to further the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in ABNJ. It is timely to consider the relevant issues with the development of the treaty underway. Currently uncertainties surround the legal definition of MGR and scope of related benefit-sharing, against a background of regional and global governance gaps in ABNJ. These complications are mirrored in science, with recent major advances in the field of genomics, but variability in handling of the resulting increasing volumes of data. Here, we attempt to define the concept of MGR from a scientific perspective, review current practices for the generation of and access to MGR from ABNJ in the context of relevant regulations, and illustrate the utility of best-practice with a case study. We contribute recommendations with a view to strengthen best-practice in accessibility of MGR, including: funder recognition of the central importance of taxonomy/biodiversity research; support of museums/collections for long-term sample curation; open access to data; usage and further development of globally recognised data standards and platforms; publishing of datasets via open-access, quality controlled and standardised data systems and open access journals; commitment to best-practice workflows; a global registry of cruises; and lastly development of a clearing house to further centralised access to the above. We argue that commitment to best-practice would allow greater sharing of MGR for research and extensive secondary use including conservation and environmental monitoring, and provide an exemplar for access and benefit-sharing (ABS) to inform the biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) process.